The article :
http://tinyurl.com/m9ey7u9
My thoughts on the article:
http://tinyurl.com/m9ey7u9
My thoughts on the article:
My article answers
This article was written by Safa
motesharrei. I believe he wrote this article to inform the public that if we
continue our life in the way we have been, it will only last a few more
decades. He says this is not because of a certain group but the entire
fundamental structure and nature of our society.
I
believe that he was informing us, because he was giving lots of facts and
examples. He wrote about how every major civilization in the past 5000 years
has collapsed because of the same reasons. There are too many people in too
many places; there is not enough food, and not enough resources to transport
the food. The romans, Mayans, many of the medieval kingdoms. They all collapsed
because of the same reasons. I agree with him because I can see this happening
all around the world already. I mean take Africa for example, it has a very
fast growing population and it cannot produce all the food it needs, and it
definitely does not have the resources to transport the food and water it needs.
Africa is obviously not faring as well as it wishes too. There are people
starving, poor healthcare, and limited access to clean water. However, places
with less people and better access to resources are faring better. As the
article says, we have to lower our numbers or nature will do it for us.
I agree with the article because of the
evidence provided. The romans and the Mayan examples really convinced me. I
mean, fear took part in the decision too, but if civilizations as great as the
Romans and Mayans can be extinguished, we do not stand that better than they
do. Yes, of course the obvious thing too says is that technology will save us,
but like the article states, technology has only made it worse. We use the
technology to make more and better ways to use and extract resources than we
use it find ways too slow it down. In other words, the pros of technology are
smaller than the cons of technology (how much the gains reinforce the existing,
over-used system) making collapse even more likely. Even after thinking up
positive outcomes, such as the world truly uniting, to stop world hunger, and
start population decrease. Chances are that these great suggestions,
unfortunately, almost certainly never be put into action.
I think that Safa has it right, “closely
reflecting the reality of the world today ... we find that collapse is
difficult to avoid.”
More thoughts :
My article, agree or disagree
My article
is about our civilizations collapse, and how it will happen within the next few
decades. I strongly agree with this article because of all the facts and
evidence provided. Another factor that convinced me was that an applied
mathematician, and a team of natural and social scientists wrote this. NASA
even sponsored it!
There are many reasons for me to agree to
the article, I will only talk about a few though. The article’s main evidence
is the societal collapses of all civilizations in the past 5000 years. They mention how every societal collapse like
the Romans and the Mayans; have involved the same five factors, population,
climate, water, agriculture, and energy. Collapse requires the stretching of
resources, and/or the hording of resources. This urged me to agree because I
can see this around the world today! I mean take Africa for example, it has a
very fast growing population, it cannot produce enough food, and it cannot
deliver all the resources it wishes to deliver, because it simply cannot handle
the strain.
Another reason I agree with the article is that
it states that technology is evil with a mask. I used to think that technology would solve
all our problems. However, after reading this article I see that technology has
only pushed us deeper into the ditch. The benefits of technology gets outweighed
by how much the gains reinforce the already existing over-burdened system. Coal
mining for example has become far more efficient since the 1950’s however; it
is much more hurtful to mother Earth because we take so much more in.
Technology that uses coal and technology that mines it have gotten far better
than how efficient we are.
My final reason for agreeing to the article
is because of simple fact. We have been
consuming more resources than the Earth can replace ever since 1970. We are headed
down the road to collapse! Our population grows the strain for resources grow,
earth starts to die, and we start to die. We probably will not lower our
numbers so it will be up to nature to reduce it in a vicious way. “closely
reflecting the reality of the world today … we find that collapse is difficult
to avoid.”